ArticleFrontiers in radiology2026
Combining computed tomography features and histogram analysis facilitates differentiation between solitary pulmonary invasive mucinous and non-mucinous adenocarcinomas.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid Deep Learning-Machine Learning Fusion of Clinical, Radiomic and Deep Learning Features for Preoperative Differentiation of Solitary Pulmonary Mucinous Adenocarcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the value of combining computed tomography (CT) morphological and histogram features for the differentiation of solitary pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (PIMA) from pulmonary invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (PINMA). Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the CT images and clinical data of 58 and 105 patients with PIMA and PINMA, respectively. CT histogram features were extracted after delineating regions of interest using 3D Slicer software. CT morphological and histogram features were compared between the PIMA and PINMA groups, and those that differed significantly were included in multivariate logistic regression models. The independent predictive factors identified were used to create CT morphological, CT histogram-based, and combined prediction models. The best-performing model was visualized and evaluated by constructing a nomogram. Results: The CT morphological prediction model included nodule type, vacuole sign, and tumor location as factors predictive of PIMA and had an area under the curve of 0.754. The CT histogram-based prediction model included kurtosis and the 90th percentile as factors predictive of PIMA and had an area under the curve of 0.820. The combined prediction model, which included tumor location, vacuole sign, kurtosis, and the 90th percentile, had an area under the curve of 0.845, suggesting greater diagnostic accuracy than the separate models. The combined prediction model also exhibited good calibration and high clinical applicability. Conclusion: Integrating CT morphological features and histogram analysis improves the accuracy of differentiating PIMA from PINMA. The nomogram provides a practical and effective tool for the non-invasive diagnosis of lung cancer subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.