ArticleDEN open2027
Prepackaged Low-Residue Diet "Clear-Through" Reduces the Required Volume of Polyethylene Glycol Solution for Colonoscopy Preparation: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Study.
Article in DEN open, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Large volumes of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution reduce patient acceptance of colonoscopy. A prepackaged low-residue diet (PLRD; Clear-Through) may improve bowel cleansing and allow further PEG reduction. This exploratory randomized study evaluated whether PLRD permits decreased PEG with ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc) volume while maintaining cleansing quality. Methods: In this single-center, endoscopist-blinded, three-arm randomized trial, 180 patients were allocated to Group A (self-adjusted diet + 1.5 L PEG-Asc), Group B (PLRD + 1.5 L PEG-Asc), or Group C (PLRD + 1.0 L PEG-Asc). The primary endpoint was cleansing quality using the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Score (OBPS). Secondary endpoints included bubble score, bowel movement frequency, adherence, tolerability, patient satisfaction compared with the previous colonoscopy, and adverse events. Logistic regression identified predictors of inadequate cleansing. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. OBPS didn't differ significantly among the groups. Group C had significantly fewer bowel movements ( Conclusions: PLRD allowed reduction of PEG-Asc to 1.0 L without impairing cleansing quality, while maintaining favorable patient satisfaction. PLRD may serve as a practical strategy to lessen patient burden during colonoscopy preparation. Trial Registration: UMIN 000056459.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.