ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2026
Developing a framework to assess off-patent medicines policies in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Review in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Countries in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) often lack a systematic approach to assessing the maturity and effectiveness of their policies for promoting off-patent (generic and biosimilar) medicines. Currently, no comprehensive, region-specific methodology exists that encompasses both generics and biosimilars. The objective of this paper is to develop a framework for assessing the performance of off-patent medicines policies that LAC countries can use to identify opportunities to improve access to these medicines in their territories. Methods: Through a scoping review of over 300 studies, this study identifies key supply- and demand-side policy interventions to promote generics and biosimilars, along with corresponding outcome indicators. This informs a logic-model-based framework, where supply-side policies are organized according to the pharmaceutical value chain, and demand-side policies are based on the target population. Results: The framework maps key policy actions, such as regulation, pricing, and substitution, to expected outcomes, such as affordability, uptake, and trust. The review highlights major regional gaps, including insufficient biosimilar policies, limited empirical evaluations, and the unique duality between public and private healthcare sectors in LAC. The existing literature gives greater attention to demand-side policies as potential factors driving higher market participation in generic and biosimilar medicines. Within this component, the emphasis is on factors aimed at education and awareness initiatives for users (41.6%). Supply-side policies are discussed less frequently, with price regulation (28.9%) most cited. By contrast, limited attention is given to other key factors such as horizon scanning, and mark-up regulation. Conclusion: The proposed framework serves as a diagnostic, analytical, and benchmarking instrument for policymakers and academia. It facilitates structured assessment, supports policy design, and fosters regional learning. Piloting and further empirical research are recommended to refine and validate the framework using a specific tool designed for this purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.