ArticleFood science & nutrition2026
Consumer Preferences, Perceived Benefits, and Determinants of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Urban Kumasi, Ghana.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption patterns within the context of Ghana's transforming food systems, driven by urbanization, economic growth, and evolving consumer preferences. Primary data was sourced from 150 respondents across low-, middle-, and high-income communities in urban Kumasi. Descriptive statistics, Kendall's coefficient of concordance, and Negative Binomial Regression were employed to analyze the data. The results showed that consumers prioritized intrinsic attributes (taste, freshness, and appearance), extrinsic attributes (price and nutritional value), and environmental-related attributes (organic and the presence of pesticides). Though the majority of respondents have a positive perception of the health and nutritional benefits of FV consumption, the actual daily intake is still abysmally low, demonstrating the gap between knowledge and practice. Factors that significantly influence FV consumption are the number of dependents, accessibility, social and cultural influences, distance to markets, and nutrition knowledge. Surprisingly, refrigerator ownership and shared household decision-making were negatively associated with vegetable intake, possibly reflecting behavioral substitutions for non-perishable produce. These findings show that behavioral and contextual factors, rather than economic attributes, serve as the primary determinants of urban dietary behavior. This paper recommends key stakeholders to pursue awareness campaigns for consumers to incorporate FV as part of daily dietary habits as part of overall wellbeing. In addition, the main agents across the urban FV supply chain (informal vendors and retailers) should be encouraged to capitalize on consumers' preference for sensory qualities such as taste, appearance, freshness, price, nutrition, organics, and seasonality, to meet demands and boost consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.