ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
A nested PCR-based point-of-care multiplex test for detection of bacterial pathogens in cerebrospinal fluids.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To integrate a multiplex one-tube nested real-time polymerase chain reaction (mOTN-PCR) with a point-of-care testing (POCT) instrument for rapid, sensitive detection of Method: The sensitivity of the mOTN-PCR was assessed using recombinant plasmids, and its specificity was evaluated using common pathogens associated with CSF infections. Simulated CSF samples were prepared using both manual nucleic acid extraction and fully automated nucleic acid extraction (POCT instrument), and then detected in parallel by mOTN-PCR and conventional real-time PCR. The clinical performance of the mOTN-PCR-POCT assay was further evaluated using 109 clinical samples (36 clinical CSF samples and 73 non-CSF clinical samples), and compared with the manual nucleic acid extraction followed by the conventional real-time PCR method. Results: The mOTN-PCR achieved detection limits (LOD) of 5, 10, and 10 copies/μL for SPN, GBS, and GAS plasmids, respectively, with no cross-reactivity. In simulated CSF samples, the LODs were 20, 10, and 20 CFU/mL for SPN, GBS, and GAS, respectively, using manual extraction, within 4 hours. The mOTN-PCR-POCT method consistently detected all three pathogens at 20 CFU/mL, reducing total testing time to approximately 2 hours. Clinical sample testing revealed that the mOTN-PCR-POCT identified three additional positives in samples previously deemed negative by conventional real-time PCR, demonstrating superior detection capability and a more streamlined operational workflow of the mOTN-PCR-POCT. Conclusion: The mOTN-PCR-POCT was demonstrated to be simple to operate, requires no culture, and enables rapid, highly sensitive detection of SPN, GBS, and GAS in CSF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.