ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026
Homelessness, justice involvement, and publicly funded substance use treatment after Medicaid expansion.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: People experiencing homelessness (PEH) and individuals referred through the criminal-justice (CJ) system face high rates of substance use disorders (SUD) and persistent barriers to treatment. Although Medicaid expansion increased insurance coverage among low-income adults with SUD, it remains unclear how these reforms affected entry into publicly funded treatment for individuals experiencing both homelessness and justice involvement. Methods: We analyzed 32.9 million specialty SUD treatment admissions reported to the Treatment Episode Data Set-Admissions (TEDS) from 2006 to 2023. Multinomial logistic regression estimated demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and insurance correlates across pathways. Comparative interrupted time series (CITS) models with state and year fixed effects assessed changes in admissions involving PEH-CJ following Medicaid expansion. Results: Of all admissions, PEH-CJ admissions showed the highest levels of socioeconomic instability, repeated treatment episodes, and stimulant involvement. Multinomial models identified elevated relative risk among American Indian/Alaska Native, Black, unemployed individuals, those with low educational attainment, and prior treatment episodes. CITS analyses showed no significant post-expansion change in PEH-CJ admission probability. Conclusion: Medicaid expansion did not alter reliance on publicly funded safety-net treatment for PEH-CJ. Continued dependence on the SUPTRS-BG highlights the need to align Medicaid reforms with strengthened safety-net financing and cross-sector support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.