ArticleJHLT open2026
Performance of bilateral bronchoalveolar lavage during routine transplant surveillance bronchoscopy changes management.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Surveillance bronchoscopy for lung transplant monitoring is a standard of care at most high-volume transplant centers, though methods vary based on institutional preferences. At our medical center, we perform bilateral bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and unilateral transbronchial biopsy. This study aims to determine how often bilateral BALs lead to a change in medical management. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study enrolling 237 patients who underwent either bilateral or single lung transplant and who underwent 759 surveillance bronchoscopies with bilateral BALs from 2020 to 2025. Data collected included demographic data, cultured pathogens bilaterally, and pathology from unilateral biopsies. Different pathogens (DP) were defined by having two positive contralateral results with differing infectious agents, or a positive result in one lung with a negative result in the contralateral lung. Change in management was defined as either alteration of antibiotic coverage or immunosuppressive drugs. Results: Eighty-three bilateral BALs (10.9%) identified DP. Of these, 43 discordant findings (5.7% of all procedures) resulted in a change in management. All 43 of these changes involved initiation or adjustment of antimicrobial therapy, and 3 (7.0%) involved an adjustment in immunosuppression. Common pathogens that prompted management changes were Conclusions: Bilateral BALs identifies clinically significant DPs in over 1 in 10 surveillance procedures, with more than half of these findings directly altering patient care. Because the most common DP identified-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.