ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
The cost of caring: understanding occupational stress among nurses at Mulago National Referral Hospital.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Occupational stress is prevalent among nurses, particularly in resource-constrained settings, where high patient volumes, limited institutional support, and societal pressures exacerbate strain. In Uganda, nurses at tertiary referral hospitals face compounded challenges, yet empirical evidence on multilevel determinants of stress is limited. This study applied the Job Demands-Resources-Support (JDRS) framework to examine health system, patient-related, and community-level factors influencing occupational stress among nurses at Mulago National Referral Hospital (MNRH). Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April to June 2024, enrolling 231 nurses through availability sampling. Occupational stress was measured using a self-reported binary indicator, and explanatory variables captured job demands, control, and support per the Job Demand-Control-Support (JDCS) framework. Descriptive statistics summarized variables, while bivariate and domain-specific multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine adjusted associations with occupational stress within health system, patient-related, and community-level domains. Results: Occupational stress prevalence was 64.5%. In domain-specific multivariable analyses, caregiver-related challenges were associated with higher odds of stress (aOR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.02-1.57), while participation in continuous professional development-based programs (aOR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.12-0.98) and lack of hospital accommodation (aOR = 0.2, 95% CI: 0.04-0.80) were associated with lower odds. Counterintuitive inverse associations were also observed for inadequate staffing and exposure to aggressive patient behavior, likely reflecting adaptation, selection effects, or residual confounding. Gender-related stressors were similarly inversely associated with stress (aOR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.52-0.88). Conclusion: Nurses at MNRH experience high occupational stress driven by complex interactions of job demands, limited resources, and societal pressures. Effective stress mitigation requires integrated interventions addressing structural capacity, professional development, and social valuation of nursing. Future research should employ longitudinal and mixed-methods designs to disentangle the dynamics of occupational stress in high-demand, resource-limited environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.