Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42058070›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Spatial equity-oriented accessibility assessment and optimal allocation of older adult care facilities in Beijing's central urban area.

Jianyi Huang, Hongjie Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jianyi HuangCollege of Applied Arts and Science, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China.
Hongjie WangCollege of Applied Arts and Science, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Population aging is a pressing global public health challenge. In aging-concentrated urban central areas, accelerated population aging has worsened the mismatch between supply and demand, irrational spatial layout, and inadequate accessibility of older adult care resources. Methods: To improve public service equity, this study took Beijing's central urban area as the research object. Using data from the 2018 Beijing Special Census on Targeted Assistance for older adults and the 2020 Full-Coverage Census of older adult care Facilities, facility accessibility was evaluated using an improved Ga2SFCA method. The number of required facilities was determined via K-means clustering combined with the elbow rule, and optimal locations was verified using particle swarm optimization and remote sensing images. Results: The results showed that: (1) Accessibility of older adult care facilities was spatially imbalanced, with some areas lacking coverage or only having single-type facilities. (2) Community service stations were the most accessible, especially in Dongcheng and Xicheng districts; older adult care centers had the lowest accessibility; while older adult care institutions performed better in peripheral zones.(3) We proposed an optimal allocation plan with 16 new facilities in underserved residential areas with high concentrations of older adults. Discussion: This integrated framework improves the precision of accessibility evaluation and site optimization. The findings offer empirical support for equitable older adult care policy-making in Beijing, helping enhance service equity and sustainable development.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityHomes for the AgedResource AllocationAgedBeijingHumansUrban PopulationBeijingcare facilitiesolder adultsoptimal allocationspatial accessibility

Identifiers

PMID42058070
PMCPMC13120901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.