ArticleBelitung nursing journal2026
Risk factors and outcomes of healthcare-associated infections in a Brazilian intensive care unit: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Belitung nursing journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in intensive care units (ICUs) are frequent and are associated with sepsis, antimicrobial resistance, and high mortality, reinforcing the need for early risk stratification at admission. Objective: To analyze risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with HAIs in ICU patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the ICU of a public hospital with 141 patients (182 HAI cases). Medical records covered ICU admissions from August 1, 2022, to August 31, 2024, and data collection occurred from November 2024 to February 2025. Data were extracted from medical records and the Hospital Infection Control Committee database. Risk factors were assessed at admission using the Rodríguez-Almeida-Cañon (RAC) Scale, which stratifies HAI risk using intrinsic and extrinsic factors and classifies patients as low, moderate, or high risk. Clinical outcomes monitored during hospitalization included hospital discharge, sepsis, septic shock, and death. Results: By RAC, 53.9% were moderate risk and 45.4% high risk; lower educational level was associated with higher risk ( Conclusion: RAC screening revealed a high burden of predisposing factors at ICU admission, particularly among patients with lower educational levels, which was associated with worse outcomes. RAC-guided admission screening can support risk-proportional nursing surveillance and targeted prevention bundles, while institutional policies should reinforce microbiological surveillance and antimicrobial stewardship tailored to social vulnerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.