ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2026
Anesthesia Services Can be Provided via Telemedicine: An Assessment of the Readiness.
Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine technology can not only improve service quality, reduce costs, and broaden access to specialized and subspecialty healthcare services, but also be utilized to provide certain anesthesia services. Objective: The objective of this study was to translate and assess the validity and reliability of the Telehealth Readiness Assessment (TRA) tool, used to evaluate the readiness of healthcare providers, for anesthesia services to implement telemedicine for delivering anesthesia services to patients. Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the initial step involved translating the questionnaire followed by an assessment of its validity and reliability. The questionnaire was then distributed to the staff members in the Anesthesiology Research Center. The readiness assessment encompassed various aspects, including Core Readiness, Financial Considerations, Operations, Staff Engagement, and Patient Readiness. Results: The Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR) were 93% and 72%, respectively. The internal consistency of each item and the overall TRA score demonstrated excellent reliability, with all values exceeding 0.90. The internal consistency coefficients ranged from 0.92 to 1.00, indicating high reliability and consistency in the measurements of the TRA questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha was 99%. The TRA subscales mean scores were 71.77±14.76, 63.25±16.14, 67.36±20.46, 68.81±18.50, and 72.52±14.39, respectively. The TRA total mean score was 68.61±17.33. Conclusion: The Persian version of the TRA questionnaire exhibits acceptable levels of validity and reliability. The readiness level related to the implementation of telemedicine for anesthesiologists was obtained as moderate. To ensure the success of telemedicine projects, it is of the utmost importance to pay close attention to the relevant indicators, with particular focus on financial considerations, as this area received the lowest score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.