ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2026
Detection of Valve Vegetations in Native and Prosthetic Valves using Echocardiographic Radiomics and Deep Learning on Transesophageal Echocardiography Images.
Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Infective Endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening condition that requires rapid and accurate diagnosis. Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) is the gold standard for detecting valve vegetations; however, its interpretation is highly operator-dependent and particularly challenging in patients with prosthetic valves. Recent advances in artificial intelligence, especially deep learning, offer opportunities to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce observer variability. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of deep learning-based models for detecting vegetations in TEE images to support the diagnostic workflow of IE. Material and Methods: In this retrospective experimental study, a Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Faster R-CNN) was implemented to localize valve vegetations in TEE images. Four model configurations were developed using DenseNet121 and ResNet50 backbones, each trained in frozen and fine-tuned modes. All models were pretrained on RadImageNet. The dataset consisted of 1,000 annotated TEE frames acquired from both native and prosthetic heart valves. Results: The fine-tuned DenseNet121 model achieved the best performance, with a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.653 and an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.858. Its frozen version demonstrated lower performance (mAP=0.416, AUC=0.640). The fine-tuned ResNet50 model reached a mAP of 0.593 and an AUC of 0.789, while the frozen ResNet50 showed the lowest performance (mAP=0.403, AUC=0.601). Conclusion: Both fine-tuned DenseNet121 and ResNet50 models demonstrated effective localization of valve vegetations in TEE images, with comparable IoU performance. Although DenseNet121 showed superior classification accuracy, the similar localization results highlight the potential of both models as physician-assistive tools for enhancing IE diagnostic workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.