ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Evaluation of probiotic supplementation to enhance growth, immune response, intestinal function, and survival in extensively raised neonatal alpacas in the Peruvian Central-southern Andes.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of multi-strain probiotics on growth, immune response, intestinal function, and survival in neonatal alpacas in the Peruvian Central-southern Andes. A total of 96 neonatal alpacas were selected, with an average weight of 7.89 ± 0.93 kg, regardless of breed (Huacaya and Suri). The study employed a completely randomized design. The neonates were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 32): control (T1), Probiolyte® WS (T2), and Polimeve Solúve (T3). Probiotics were administered orally on days 1, 7, 14, 21, and 30 of age. Body weight gain and size were recorded on days 1, 15, 30, 60, and 90; immune response was assessed on 30 and 90 days; and intestinal functional status was evaluated on day 90. The neonates supplemented with Polimeve exhibited greater thoracic circumference after 60 days of age, and increased height at the withers and rump at 15 days (p < 0.05). At 90 days, the Polimeve group had a higher proportion of basophils, while the Probiolyte and control groups showed higher proportions of monocytes (p < 0.05). IgG concentrations at 30 and 90 days did not differ significantly among groups. Probiotic supplementation did not affect ileal villus length; however, it influenced the depth of jejunal and cecal crypts (p < 0.05). Morbidity and mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups. In conclusion, probiotics did not significantly influence growth, immune response, or intestinal function; however, Polimeve may improve weight gain in neonates, while Probiolyte can increase IgG concentrations during the first 30 days of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.