ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2026
Brown Bear, Brown Bear, What Do You See? Speakers Use More Redundant Color Adjectives When Speaking to Children Than Adults.
Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-culturally, the evolution and production of color words has been linked to communicative efficiency. In visual search tasks for instance, speakers will direct a listener to a target by referring to both its color and shape even when all the targets are unique. Moreover, speakers produce these redundant color adjectives more in languages where they precede the noun, like English, than in ones where they are postnominal, like Spanish. These results are consistent with an Incremental Collaborative Efficiency Hypothesis: the proposal that speakers are sensitive to listeners' online processing demands. If this is the case, speakers should be especially likely to produce redundant color adjectives for children, since children's visual search is especially slow. Here we show that English (Experiment 1) and Spanish-speaking (Experiment 2) adults, and parents and non-parents alike (Experiment 3), selectively generate redundant color adjectives for children. This is not because of a general bias towards being over-informative with children: when redundant color adjectives are uninformative and would not promote efficient search, speakers are no more likely to use them with children than adults (Experiment 4). Finally, children's own use of redundant color adjectives for efficient communication changes over development. Four to ten-year-olds are less likely to produce redundant color adjectives than adults but nonetheless do so selectively when addressing younger children (Experiments 5 and 6). Collectively, these results suggest that sensitivity to listeners' online processing demands is robust, emerges relatively early in development, and may especially benefit young learners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.