ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Drug-coated balloon angioplasty for symptomatic vertebral artery origin stenosis: a real-world analysis of efficacy and predictors for bailout stenting.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for treating symptomatic vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS) in a real-world setting and to investigate potential factors necessitating intraoperative bailout stenting (BS). Methods: This single-center retrospective study enrolled 121 consecutive symptomatic VAOS patients treated with DCB angioplasty at Xuzhou First People's Hospital between January 2022 and December 2024. Patients were classified into the DCB group or the BS group based on the requirement for intraoperative bailout stenting. Stenosis rates were compared within the DCB group at baseline, immediately post-procedure, and at ≥3- and ≥12-month follow-up, as well as between the DCB and BS groups at corresponding time points. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariable logistic regression were used for variable selection, and a nomogram was constructed and evaluated using the concordance index ( Results: Technical success was achieved in 94 patients (77.6%), while bailout stenting was required in 27 patients (22.3%). The median stenosis of the DCB group decreased from 83% at baseline to 36% immediately post-procedure ( Conclusion: DCB angioplasty was associated with favorable angiographic durability in symptomatic VAOS, with similar long-term patency between balloon-only and bailout stent strategies. Higher diastolic blood pressure, and concomitant carotid stenosis were associated with bailout stenting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.