ArticleSSM - population health2026
Side messages, side effects: Justifying infection prevention but fuelling social polarisation.
Article in SSM - population health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As infectious diseases spread, governments and specialised agencies typically release a main message conveying the recommended preventive action, accompanied by side messages justifying the action. In this study, we explored how side messages influence intentions to engage in infection prevention behaviours, attitudes toward people who do versus do not support infection prevention measures, and evaluations of the poster. We conducted three repeated cross-sectional online surveys in Japan and the United States in September, November, and December 2024. Participants were presented with posters promoting hand washing and mask wearing that included one of five side messages: self/other protection, public health, social norms, self/other protection plus norms, or public health plus norms. Meta-analyses of the three surveys showed side-message effects on intentions varied by country and baseline compliance: in Japan, for individuals who initially had high compliance tendencies, side messages combining social norms with additional justifications (self/other protection or public health) promoted behavioural intent, whereas in the United States, side messages that justified public health outcomes were most effective in promoting behavioural intent. We found no evidence that side-message content altered intergroup bias, defined as the difference in attitudes towards people who share one's own views versus those holding opposing views regarding infection prevention measures. However, the posters were perceived as coercive and stressful, particularly among participants with low baseline compliance, indicating that campaign designers may consider crafting messages that encourage adherence to infection prevention measures while taking care not to increase criticism of non-compliant individuals, who are often in the minority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.