ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Unlocking antimicrobial stewardship optimization potential in Canadian hospitals: a mixed-methods needs assessment.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A greater understanding of the enduring challenges associated with the implementation and impact of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes in Canadian hospitals is needed. Objectives: To identify the gaps and barriers at the individual, team and systemic level affecting the capacity of hospital physicians, microbiologists and pharmacists to diagnose, treat and manage infections in concordance with AMS principles in Canada. Methods: A sequential mixed-method needs assessment was performed, with a qualitative exploratory phase informing a quantitative validating phase. Discrepancy analysis between current and expected measures was performed to identify gaps. Results: Two distinct study samples of hospital healthcare providers (HCPs) were obtained: 20 interviewees and 100 survey completers. Triangulated results demonstrated sub-optimal: (i) competencies of HCPs to follow AMS recommendations and to educate patients on antimicrobial resistance, (ii) competencies of leaders to build capacity and trust in AMS recommendations and (iii) funding and organizational capacity to fully implement AMS strategies. On average, 45% of HCPs had both an educational and behavioural gap relevant to AMS. A sense of distrust towards AMS recommendations was reported by 71% of HCPs. Over half (56%) of HCPs stated that AMS strategies were not fully implemented despite a perception that their practice setting had full AMS funding. Systemic barriers included strained human resources, a lack of specialized personnel and unfavourable performance metrics. Conclusions: This study sheds light on what prevents the integration of AMS strategies in Canadian hospitals. Changes at the educational, organizational and leadership levels are required to fully unlock the potential of AMS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.