ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Antibiotic prescribing by non-medical healthcare professionals in primary care: a systematic review of effects on antibiotic use, patient experience, interprofessional relationships and job satisfaction.
Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Demand for primary care services has increased significantly in the last decade, with substantial pressure placed on general practitioners (GPs), such as in the English Pharmacy First programme. Developing a more diverse skill mix to include other healthcare professionals (HCPs), such as nurses and pharmacists in the management of common, acute, self-limiting infections is considered part of the solution to this issue in many countries. Aim/objectives: This study aims to review the evidence available on the effects of expanding antibiotic prescribing to include HCPs other than doctors in primary care with a focus on antibiotic use, patient experience, interprofessional relationships and job satisfaction. Methods: Five databases were searched; EMBASE, Policy Commons, Web of Science, Scopus and Overton. The search covered the period 2010-2025. In total, 20 studies from nine countries were included. Data extraction followed PRISMA 2020 guidance, and risk of bias was assessed using the CASP (2024) qualitative checklist. Owing to heterogeneity, findings were synthesized using narrative synthesis following SWiM guidelines. Results: Antibiotic prescribing by non-medical HCPs is increasing but remains a small proportion of total prescribing (e.g. 6.5% in England, 3.2% in Australia), with nurse prescribers providing a notable proportion of antibiotic prescriptions (56% in New Zealand). Public awareness of HCP antibiotic prescribing is limited but patient satisfaction with HCP prescribing is favourable (e.g. 75% in England). Job satisfaction improved where supervision and role recognition were strong, but decreased when workload increased without support. Conclusions: Continuing professional development and supportive work environments improve prescribing confidence, promote safer practices and support longer-term HCP retention. To maximize the benefits of non-medical prescribing, clearer role definitions, stronger interprofessional collaboration and integration within antimicrobial stewardship programmes are needed. Future research should assess prescribing appropriateness and the wider system-level impact on antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.