ArticleHealth science reports2026
Health Literacy Prediction Based on Information Literacy and Physical Literacy Components: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Despite the growing recognition of the importance of physical literacy, information literacy, and health literacy, there is a lack of research on their relationships among university staff. This study aimed to investigate the predictive relationship between health literacy and the components of information literacy and physical literacy among staff at university. Methods: Using a cross-sectional design and convenience sampling, the study collected information among 250 administrative university staff via demographic, health literacy, information literacy, and physical literacy instruments. To identify predictors of health literacy, a multiple linear regression model was fitted with health literacy as the dependent variable. Statistical analysis was conducted with SPSS. Results: The mean scores for health literacy, physical literacy, and information literacy were 3.98, 3.31, and 3.08, respectively. The results showed that health literacy is significantly and positively associated with information literacy (β = 0.84, Conclusion: Information literacy was a robust predictor of health literacy, independent of physical literacy, age, marital status, or gender. Education also contributed to health literacy, albeit to a modest extent. Interventions aiming to boost health literacy should prioritize strengthening information literacy skills, with considerations for educational background to optimize impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.