ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Post-marketing safety evaluation of paroxetine: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor widely used in the management of major depressive disorders and other psychiatric disorders, remains insufficiently characterized regarding its adverse event spectrum. Thus, this study wanted to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of its post-marketing safety profile by analyzing reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: Adverse event data related to paroxetine were extracted from the FAERS spanning the period from the first quarter of 2004 through the second quarter of 2025. Demographic distributions and reporter characteristics were analyzed to describe the exposed population. Signal detection was performed using four established disproportionality algorithms, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Results: A total of 39,404 adverse event reports associated with paroxetine were included in the analysis. Female patients accounted for the majority of cases (57.41%), followed by males (32.84%). The most frequently reported preferred term (PT) was "drug withdrawal syndrome," categorized under systemic diseases and administration site conditions, with 6,601 cases. This event demonstrated strong positive signals across all disproportionality metrics (ROR = 27.27, PRR = 26.31, χ Conclusion: The pharmacovigilance assessment of paroxetine systematically identified significant safety signals. These findings provide important post-marketing evidence to strengthen drug safety surveillance and facilitate more informed, patient-centered therapeutic decisions in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.