ArticleActa histochemica et cytochemica2026
Semantic Segmentation for Pixel-Wise Visualization of Breast Cancer in Deep Ultraviolet-Excited Fluorescence Images.
Article in Acta histochemica et cytochemica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microscopy with ultraviolet surface excitation (MUSE) enables rapid fluorescence imaging of tissue surfaces, but MUSE images differ markedly from conventional hematoxylin and eosin images, making cancer delineation challenging for routine pathological practice. We investigated the feasibility of deep learning-based semantic segmentation, which assigns a class label to each pixel, for pixel-wise breast cancer detection in MUSE images. Fresh breast tissues from 30 mastectomy patients with breast cancer were stained with terbium and Hoechst and imaged by MUSE. A total of 150 cancerous images (five per case) were manually annotated into cancerous and non-cancerous classes, and 300 non-cancerous images (ten per case) were collected. Models were trained and evaluated using five-fold nested cross-validation, comparing a cancer-only (CO) model trained solely on cancerous images with a cancer plus non-cancer (CN) model trained on both cancerous and non-cancerous images. The CO model achieved a higher Dice score than the CN model (CO, 0.7478; CN, 0.7343). Sliding window-based majority voting post-processing reduced scattered false-positive areas and improved Dice scores (CO, 0.7984; CN, 0.7849). These results support the feasibility of deep learning-based semantic segmentation for visualizing breast cancer regions and provide a basis for future quantitative applications using MUSE images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.