Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42057777›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026

Antibacterial Drug Discovery: Deep Learning Successes and Challenges through the Structural Biology Lens.

Jameel M Abduljalil, Sandro F Ataide, Ann H Kwan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jameel M AbduljalilSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6458-463X
Sandro F AtaideSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ann H KwanSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continuous rise of multidrug-resistant pathogens necessitates an urgent need for new antibiotics, yet innovation in antibiotic discovery has largely stalled since the 1980s. In traditional drug development, around 90% of candidate molecules fail at the preclinical stage or phase I of trials due to toxicity or lack of efficacy. Effective antibiotic discovery must overcome a set of microbiological challenges: selective bacterial targeting, penetration of complex cell envelopes, and evasion of diverse resistance mechanisms. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) offer promising opportunities to address these challenges. DL can help identify and characterize new bacterial targets, predict accurate 3-dimensional structures, assess druggability, and discover lead molecules with antibiotic potential. Generative models further enable the de novo design of candidates with optimized pharmacokinetics and safety profiles, potentially resolving long-standing toxicity issues. These technologies streamline labor-intensive screening and boost efficiency in the drug discovery pipeline. However, DL methods need to be applied judiciously. Their effectiveness depends on appropriate model selection, high-quality training data, and careful interpretation of predictions particularly when predicting properties for novel microbial targets. This review provides a timely and critical analysis of DL applications in antibacterial hit discovery through the lens of structural biology, offering structural biologists a road map for integrating these tools into antibiotic discovery workflows to help combat antimicrobial resistance.

Identifiers

PMID42057777
PMCPMC13123415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.