ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Lean and Green Hand Surgery in the Office: Does It Work?
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The safety of wide-awake (WA) anesthesia has been documented in multiple studies. An advantage of WA is the ability to do Lean and Green hand surgery. Lean and Green surgery can be performed safely with considerable cost savings, reduced waste, and high patient satisfaction. This study reviews one surgeon's experience combining both WA and Lean and Green surgery principles in an office-based procedure room. This study evaluates patient satisfaction, complications, and cost savings in a group of patients treated with WA anesthesia and a Lean and Green technique. Methods: A retrospective chart review of a single surgeon's office-based cases was performed. In total, 437 surgical cases performed over a 12-month period were reviewed. Institutional review board approval was not needed for the chart review. Study items included infections, secondary procedures, patient satisfaction, and cost and trash savings seen with custom (Lean and Green) surgical packs. Results: The overall infection rate was 5% (all superficial infections). All infections were treated with oral antibiotics. There were no deep infections and no secondary procedures. The cost and waste savings using the Lean and Green surgical packs were significant. Using the custom surgical packs, there was a cost savings of $4,650 for the year. The waste savings were significant: 2,211 pounds (lbs) or 1.1 tons. Patient satisfaction was high. In total, 99% rated their surgical experience the same or better than a dental visit. In addition, 99% would recommend to a friend or family member, and 99% would do the office-based surgery again. Conclusions: Office-based WA hand surgery using Lean and Green principles is safe and cost-effective with high patient satisfaction. Clinical relevance: Office-based hand surgery combined with WA surgical principles and custom Lean and Green surgical packs was safe, cost-effective, and environmentally sound with high patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.