ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2026
Characterising Reference Intervals in Clinically Normal Red Wolves (Canis rufus): A Baseline for the Detection of Clinical Disease.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe American red wolf (Canis rufus) is a critically endangered canid that has been extirpated throughout most of its historic range in the United States. To counter the decline of this charismatic species, captive breeding programs were established in the 1970s and 1980s and reservoirs for the red wolf population continue to be managed at zoological institutions around North America. Complicating management, red wolves suffer from a high prevalence of chronic illness in captivity, often contributing to reduced fecundity and survival in breeding programs.
objectivesGiven the above concerns, as well as the lack of a true species-specific baseline to diagnose disease in general, this study sought to establish concise clinical reference intervals for commonly used haematological and biochemical parameters in red wolves.
methodsUtilising exclusion criteria set by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) and the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP), this study established clinical reference intervals for 35 biochemical and haematological parameters from 31 healthy captive red wolves at the Red Wolf Propagation Facility in Graham, Washington. RESULTS AND
conclusionsThe clinical reference intervals developed by this study offer the first set of healthy, species-specific baselines to diagnose disease that may better serve veterinary clinicians in earlier detection of illness and initiation of treatment, which is likely to improve long-term clinical outcomes and disease management in red wolves. CLINICAL STUDY REGISTRATION: This work was performed ad hoc alongside ongoing efforts for wolf management and is not associated with a registered clinical study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.