ArticleJournal of diabetes research2026
Towards the Development of an Insulin Degradation Test.
Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards the Development of an Insulin Degradation Test.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People with diabetes rely on exogenous insulin to reduce blood glucose levels, compensating for insulin resistance or impaired pancreatic β-cell function. Despite being essential for diabetes management, insulin formulations exhibit inconsistent performance due to their relatively fragile stability. This instability carries significant cost implications: Some individuals spend over $1000 per month on insulin, and these high prices influence one in six Americans with diabetes to ration their insulin supplies. Environmental stressors can induce conformational changes that cause insulin to misfold and aggregate into fibrils, which are inactive structures that contribute to long-term diabetic complications. Although insulin's instability is well-documented, no test currently exists outside of laboratory settings to determine whether an insulin formulation has fibrillated. Here, we compare biochemical techniques for assessing bioactivity and structural integrity in three commercial insulin analogs exposed to physiologically relevant stress conditions, showing that fibril formation precedes measurable loss of bioactivity in insulin and that fibrillation depends on both the stressor type and the insulin formulation tested. We then demonstrate proof-of-concept testing for antibody-based fibrillation detection using commercial monoclonal antibody candidates. Together, these findings underscore the critical need for accessible insulin quality testing and demonstrate the feasibility of antibody-based detection of insulin fibrillation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.