Trial reportJournal of diabetes research2026
Diabetes Management by Ayurvedic Practitioners Using a Clinical Guideline Versus Usual Practice: A Feasibility Cluster Randomized Trial in Nepal.
Trial report in Journal of diabetes research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05259735 (A Clinical Guideline-based Management of Type-2 Diabetes by Ayurvedic Practitioners in Nepal), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Clinical Guideline-based Management of Type-2 Diabetes by Ayurvedic Practitioners in Nepal: a Feasibility Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diabetes Management by Ayurvedic Practitioners Using a Clinical Guideline Versus Usual Practice: A Feasibility Cluster Randomized Trial in Nepal.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Trial
- Integration of Cardiovascular Disease Services within Primary Health Care Systems: Insights from South Asia.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Diabetes management using a clinical guideline versus usual practice: a feasibility trial-based qualitative study among Ayurvedic practitioners and patients in Nepal.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is prevalent in Nepal, with many seeking primary care through Ayurveda, a widely practiced traditional system. However, concerns exist about suboptimal care and variability in clinical practice among Ayurvedic practitioners. No evidence-based clinical practice guideline (EB-CPG) is available for managing T2DM. Therefore, an EB-CPG was developed, and a feasibility study was conducted to inform a future cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing whether EB-CPG improves T2DM management compared with usual practice.
methodsA two-arm feasibility cluster RCT was conducted in Ayurveda centers. Centers were randomized (1:1) by an independent statistician. Adults with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve T2DM and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 6.5%-< 9% were recruited. Data collectors and the analyst were blinded to group allocation.
resultsFourteen Ayurveda centers were approached, all recruited (seven/group) and completed the study. One center withdrew and did not enroll participants. Of 151 potential participants, 121 (80%) were recruited (60 in intervention and 61 in control). Of those, 84% were followed up to 6 months (51/group). The median adherence score to EB-CPG among practitioners was 1-2 (partial to adequate adherence). The median (interquartile range) number of EB-CPG-recommended medicines not consumed by participants and days without consumption was 0 (0-10) and 0 (0-2.5), respectively. No serious adverse events occurred. Preliminary estimates suggest EB-CPG's beneficial effects on HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, and health-related quality-of-life, though not statistically significant.
conclusionThis feasibility trial demonstrated successful recruitment, follow-up, and intervention adherence. A definitive trial is feasible to evaluate the intervention's effectiveness in T2DM management. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05259735; first posted on March 02, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.