Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42057317›Full record

ReviewJournal of feline medicine and surgery

Rational approach to feline medical emergencies: part 2.

Nicki Reed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of feline medicine and surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Rational approach to feline medical emergencies: part 2.Journal of feline medicine and surgery
    Review
  3. Rational approach to feline medical emergencies: part 1.Journal of feline medicine and surgery
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nicki ReedVeterinary Specialists Scotland, Livingston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2131-053X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical challengesEmergencies cause disruption to the normal flow of the working day in a busy veterinary practice, requiring diversion of resources from routine cases to assist with the medical priority. Assessments and decisions have to be made rapidly, which can be challenging if the particular condition is not dealt with on a regular basis.

aimsThis two-part article series aims to help practitioners feel more confident with the most common types of cases that can present as emergencies and to highlight some of the areas where feline patients require a different approach from their canine counterparts. This second article focuses on the medical emergencies of seizures, urethral obstruction, acute kidney injury and diabetic ketoacidosis. This follows on from Part 1, which discussed priorities for triage and stabilisation of emergency patients, before addressing the management of shock, dyspnoea, feline aortic thromboembolism and anaemia.AudienceThe intended audience is general practitioners who may be confronted with emergency cases on an irregular basis, although clinicians working in out-of-hours services may also find useful details to update their knowledge. EVIDENCE BASE: Although much of the information covered is well established, the article series introduces knowledge and clinical techniques that have emerged in the literature in the past 5 years.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesEmergenciesEmergency Medical ServicesAcute Kidney InjuryAnimalsCatsDiabetic KetoacidosisSeizuresUrethral Obstructionazotaemiadiabetic ketoacidosisDKAMedical emergenciesseizures

Identifiers

PMID42057317
PMCPMC13150148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.