ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2026
Interprofessional Competence of Health and Social Care Professionals Working in Specialized Palliative Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe aim of this paper is to assess interprofessional competence and explain factors associated with it among health and social care professionals working in specialized palliative care hospital wards.
designThe research study employs a descriptive cross-sectional approach. ETHICS: The study followed good scientific practice. Ethical approvals were obtained from the Ethics Committee of Tampere University (85/2022) and the Ethics Committee of the Pirkanmaa Wellbeing Services County (6/2023). Research permits were obtained separately from each institution that participated in the study. Participation was voluntary, contingent on informed consent and the confidentiality of participants was protected.
methodsIn total, 153 health and social care professionals from 16 specialized palliative care wards in Finland participated in the study. The data were collected from May 2023 to March 2024, using the previously validated generic IPEC instrument and newly developed, palliative-care-specific ICOPA self-assessment instruments. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Due to the data not being normally distributed, non-parametric Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied, depending on the number of groups compared. Pearson's correlation was used to examine associations between variables.
resultsHealth and social care professionals self-assessed their interprofessional competence as good. Among the interprofessional competencies, values and ethics were assessed highest, while teams and teamwork were assessed lowest. Education level, participation in interprofessional education, work experience, amount of teamwork conducted in their own unit, and evaluation considering teamwork functionality had a statistically significant association with professionals' better self-assessed interprofessional competence.
conclusionThe results have identified competence gaps that will guide the development of interprofessional practice. However, because the currently used instruments are based on self-assessment, objective measures are also needed to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of interprofessional competence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.