ArticleThe Gerontologist2026
Mapping factors influencing the success of group activities for persons with dementia through the comprehensive process model of group engagement.
Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesEngagement with appropriate activities is crucial for the well-being of persons living with dementia. This analysis used data from a study of activities to map the components of the Comprehensive Process Model of Group Engagement as the organizing theoretical framework. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThe study included 6 nursing-care units and 4 senior day center units for persons living with dementia in Israel. The persons living with dementia participated in group activities using enhanced group activity kits while their participation and well-being were assessed by both research observers and facility staff who led the activities. Inductive content analysis was used to: (a) map the theoretical model, and (b) clarify factors affecting the quality of group activities.
resultsThemes that emerged from the content analysis were organized around the model, including attributes of (a) the stimulus: topic, materials, and activity leader, (b) participants: cognitive and related function, language barriers, physical, and behavioral, emotional, and related conditions, and treatment side-effects, and (c) environment: physical and systemic barriers. In addition, interactions among stimulus, participant, and environment are reported. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The analysis demonstrated the complexity of the factors affecting the quality, appropriateness, and limitations of group activities. The sub-themes can be used to evaluate activities' appropriateness for persons living with dementia and the adequacy of the environment in which activities are held. In addition to an organizing framework to examine activities and their utility in depth, the Comprehensive Process Model of Group Engagement provides a structure for planning new activities, conducting quality assessment and improving activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.