ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Impact of cooling garments on performance during and after vigorous, heart-rate-clamped exercise in young males under hot and humid conditions.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to clarify the effects of the following cooling garments on performance during and after vigorous, heart-rate-clamped exercise under hot and humid conditions: base layers made of cross-shaped fibers (C), sugar alcohol-printed base layers (S), and a combination of S with a fan-attached jacket (S+F). Fifteen healthy male participants wore the cooling garments and rested for 20 min in a room set to ~30°C and ~60% relative humidity. The participants then completed a 20-min cycle ergometer exercise with heart rate clamped at 65% of heart rate reserve and rated their perceived exertion (RPE). Before and after exercise, we assessed thermal, comfort, and wetness sensations and measured body temperature, vertical jump height, ground reaction force during rising from the chair, visual reaction time, and the Stroop interference. Cooler sensations were consistently reported in the order of S+F, S, and C. Despite the lowest RPE, pedaling load was highest in S+F. Sweat loss was comparable among the conditions, while garment sweat absorption and post-exercise skin temperature were lowest in S+F. These results suggest that S+F improves endurance performance under hot and humid conditions through efficient evaporative heat loss mainly facilitated by increased airflow from the fans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.