ArticleHead & face medicine2026
A phantom study on the evaluation of the YOLOv8 deep learning model in the detection of tooth ankylosis on cone-beam computed tomography images.
Article in Head & face medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the performance of a deep learning algorithm for detecting tooth ankylosis on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. A dataset of CBCT scans taken from phantoms simulating tooth ankylosis, including 60 teeth and a total of 4971 axial sections, was used to design an ankylosis detection model using the YOLOv8 algorithm. The first dataset (42 teeth, 70%) with 3822 axial sections comprised the training dataset, while the second dataset (18 teeth, 30%) with 1149 axial sections comprised the test dataset. The YOLOv8 algorithm was used to optimize the precise and efficient detection of the ankylotic area. Training loss was monitored during the learning process. Also, precise optimizations such as adaptive learning rate were used to ensure model convergence. The dice, precision, recall, and F1 score were calculated to assess the model's performance. Training loss of the designed model reached < 10% after 100 training epochs. The model showed 80% precision, 82% dice, 90.9% recall, and 83.9% F1 score. The designed model using the YOLOv8 algorithm performed optimally in efficient and precise detection of tooth ankylosis on CBCT scans and could be integrated into the clinical workflow, aiding clinicians and radiologists. Future studies are recommended to focus on further refinement of this model using larger datasets, architectural optimization, combining in-vivo and in-vitro datasets for model generalizability, and comparing radiologists' and the model's performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.