Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42057137›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2026

Providing effective and efficient hospital admission avoidance inpatient care: a systematic realist review of Norwegian municipal inpatient acute care services.

Sujan Rijal, Marianne Sundlisæter Skinner, Simon Briscoe, Fan Yang, Rob Anderson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sujan RijalCentre for Care Research, Department of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Helvin-bygget, C229, Teknologiveien 22, Gjøvik, 2815, Norway. sujan.rijal@ntnu.no.
Marianne Sundlisæter SkinnerCentre for Care Research, Department of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Helvin-bygget, C229, Teknologiveien 22, Gjøvik, 2815, Norway.
Simon BriscoeUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Fan YangCentre for Care Research, Department of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Helvin-bygget, C229, Teknologiveien 22, Gjøvik, 2815, Norway.
Rob AndersonUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare spending in high-income countries has outpaced economic growth in recent decades, with hospital services accounting for a high proportion of it. Health systems in most high-income countries have explored models of intermediate care to provide less resource-intensive care outside hospitals. Different models of admission avoidance intermediate care have been introduced in countries with varying approach, capacity and settings e.g. hospital-at-home (HaH), inpatient admission avoidance intermediate care (AAIC) schemes. Although approaches like HaH have shown to be effective in providing care at a lower cost, inpatient AAIC schemes are less studied. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a realist review to capture evidence for explaining effectiveness in regards to utilisation and quality of care provided, and cost of admission avoidance intermediate care services. We searched for literature in three online databases (Ovid Medline, Embase and CINAHL) plus supplementary search methods (forward and backward citation searching) during October-December 2022 followed by a supplementary search in January 2026 to: (1) formulate initial programme theories and (2) refine programme theories. A total of 2625 studies from database search and eight more from manual searches were retrieved. After screening, full text of thirty five papers were explored out of which = analysis of eleven qualitative papers was included in the review for the formulation of programme theories which was further revised and refined through a stakeholder consultation. Seven empirical studies were used for refining the initial programme theories. From these, we developed seven programme theories and a theoretical framework, with researchers independently involved in theming data and developing explanatory causal chains of context-mechanism-outcome. Although the review was intended to seek evidence from inpatient admission avoidance intermediate care schemes from high-income European countries, most of the evidence originated from a particular scheme in Norway.

resultsThree programme theories for explaining effectiveness related to referral to and utilisation of inpatient AAIC services: General practitioners' (GPs') positive/favourable perception of the care within inpatient AAICs; GPs' confidence, security, and fulfilment of responsibility; and synergy and respect between healthcare providers. Two programme theories were related to quality of care: comfort and convenience for patients and an enabling working environment for nurses. Two programme theories were related to the cost of care: adaptive resources and payment mode. A causal framework for effective and efficient implementation and delivery of inpatient AAIC service was constructed.

conclusionThis review informs policymakers and managers towards successfully adapting inpatient AAIC services to specific settings. Intended outcomes are achieved when an enabling environment is ensured for both service providers and users. Flexibility in resource use facilitates efficient organisation of services. More primary research with a focus on the identification and evidencing of mechanisms - of how and why inpatient AAIC services work - is necessary to further inform the design and delivery of such services in different contexts.

Indexed as

HospitalizationPatient AdmissionHumansInpatientsNorwayQuality of Health CareAcute careCostEfficiencyHospital admission avoidance intermediate careInpatientPatient satisfactionQuality of careRealist reviewRealist synthesisUtilisation

Identifiers

PMID42057137
PMCPMC13270756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.