ArticleBMC psychology2026
Interpreting mental health experiences in disaster settings: a qualitative analysis of medical students' reflective narratives during flood response in Thailand.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisasters disrupt social systems, threaten physical safety, and generate substantial psychological distress among affected populations. Disaster psychiatry has often focused on psychiatric symptoms and service delivery, with less attention paid to the experiences of patients' families' experiences of suffering, caregiving, and recovery within disrupted social environments.
methodsThis qualitative interpretive study analyzed second-order reflective narratives written by sixteen medical students who participated in supervised psychiatric and mental health care during flood disaster responses in Southern Thailand. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted, following the six-phase framework of Braun and Clarke, to explore students' observations of patient experiences, family caregiving, and the social conditions influencing mental health during the disaster.
resultsFive interconnected themes emerged. First, participants observed that basic survival needs, including food, shelter, and access to medication, were essential foundations for psychological recovery. Second, narratives described lived experiences of suffering, uncertainty caused by displacement, illness, and disruption of daily life. Third, students observed varied forms of resilience and meaning-making as individuals sought hope and purpose amid adversity. Fourth, family caregiving emerged as a central source of relational dignity and continuity of care. Finally, reflections highlighted structural vulnerability and the limits of medicine, as poverty disrupted access to resources, and social inequalities shaped patient experiences, requiring broader social support.
conclusionThe findings suggest the importance of social and relational dimensions of disaster mental health experiences. Suffering, resilience, and recovery were closely intertwined with family relationships, community networks, and structural conditions. Recognizing these factors may support more holistic approaches to disaster mental health care, disaster response planning, and medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.