ArticleBMC medical education2026
Knowledge, attitudes, and training on genetic testing among public health professionals and students in the United Arab Emirates: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs genetic testing becomes increasingly relevant to precision public health, understanding the preparedness of the public health workforce is essential. In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), national initiatives such as the Emirati Genome Program are progressing rapidly; however, the integration of genetic testing into public health training and practice remains limited.
objectiveTo examine the knowledge, attitudes, and training on genetic testing among public health professionals and students in the UAE, and to identify perceived barriers and enablers to its integration into public health practice.
methodsA qualitative descriptive design with embedded quantitative components was used. Semi‑structured interviews were conducted with 19 purposively selected public health stakeholders, including faculty members, postgraduate students, and public health professionals. Participants completed a brief pre‑interview survey capturing demographics, education, and self‑reported and objective knowledge on genetic testing. Qualitative data were analyzed using structured coding procedures, and quantitative data were summarized descriptively.
resultsTraining on genetic testing was limited across undergraduate and postgraduate education, and most participants rated their knowledge as insufficient. Participants demonstrated moderate understanding of analytic validity, clinical validity, clinical utility, and the existence of international guidelines. However, some knowledge questions showed noticeably lower correct‑response rates. Despite these gaps, participants expressed positive attitudes toward the relevance of genetic testing for public health. Four themes emerged: recognition of genetic testing's value for disease prevention; sociocultural and ethical considerations influencing public acceptance; the need for enhanced education and institutional capacity; and cautious support for regulated consumer‑initiated genetic testing.
conclusionPublic health professionals and students who participated in the current study in the UAE show strong interest in genetic testing but report suboptimal training. Addressing these gaps will require systematic integration of genomics into public health curricula, targeted workforce development, and supportive policy frameworks aligned with national precision health initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.