Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42057118›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2026

Therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles from different tissue sources on diminished ovarian reserve and the related mechanisms.

Jialin Li, Mengqing Gu, Yibo Wang, Yanan Qi, Wenfeng Xie, Yichuan Zhang, Lin Fu, Yandong Chen, Xinpei Sun, Yanru Lou and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jialin Li *State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3682-1495
Mengqing Gu *State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2737-7126
Yibo WangState Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yanan QiState Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Department of Urology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Wenfeng XieState Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yichuan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Lin FuState Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yandong ChenClinical Stem Cell Research Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Xinpei SunClinical Stem Cell Research Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yanru LouState Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yaodong ZhangState Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jie Qiao *State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China. jie.qiao@263.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2126-1376
Yang YuState Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China. yuyang5012@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4310-1966
Rui YangState Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China. yrjeff@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6381-5202

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFC2706600the Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research of Beijing 2024-2-40911the Frontiers Medical Center Tianfu Jincheng Laboratory Foundation TFJCPI20250032the National Natural Science Funds 82192873 and 82225019the Special Project on Capital Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment Technology Research and Transformation Application Z211100002921054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) significantly reduced success rates in assisted reproduction, making DOR a major clinical challenge in assisted reproductive technologies. Recent studies have indicated that extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) hold promise for improving ovarian function, yet the impact of tissue origin on EVs function remains unclear. Adipose tissue and the umbilical cord are common and easily accessible sources of MSCs. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of adipose-derived MSC- EVs (A-EVs) and umbilical cord MSC- EVs (U-EVs) in a cyclophosphamide-induced DOR mouse model, investigate their underlying mechanisms and provide experimental evidence for selecting the most promising EVs source for clinical application.

resultsProteomic analysis revealed differences protein composition between U-EVs and A-EVs. Both A-EVs and U-EVs significantly increased serum AMH levels and improved fertility, whereas U-EVs produced more sustained reproductive benefits. Single-cell RNA sequencing and in vitro functional validation demonstrated that EV treatment reduced granulosa-cell apoptosis, oxidative stress, DNA-damage responses, and senescence signatures, with U-EVs exerting broader regulatory effects.

conclusionsIn conclusion, both A-EVs and U-EVs improved ovarian function in DOR mice; however, U-EVs demonstrated greater efficacy in promoting long-term fertility and inhibiting granulosa cell apoptosis, indicating greater potential for clinical translation.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesMesenchymal Stem CellsOvarian ReserveOvaryAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAgingAnimalsApoptosisCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCyclophosphamideFemaleGene Expression RegulationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCyclophosphamideItm2b protein, mouseRgs2 protein, mouseRGS ProteinsDiminished ovarian reserveExtracellular vesiclesMesenchymal stem cellsProteomics

Identifiers

PMID42057118
PMCPMC13274086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.