ArticleBiology of sex differences2026
Female rats are more vulnerable to binge drinking behavior in an operant self-administration paradigm: implication for transition to alcohol use disorders.
Article in Biology of sex differences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While binge drinking can significantly impact health negatively, it has become increasingly important to understand how sex differences contribute to this hazardous behavior, which may also serve as a risk factor for alcohol use disorder. We employed the binge drinking experimental model we developed previously to specifically analyze sex differences. Forty male and 40 female Long Evans rats were tested in the alcohol self-administration procedure, operationalized as alcohol responding in short daily session. We tested other parameters, including motivation, seeking, responses during cue omission sessions, withdrawal scores, and relapse after abstinence. We also conducted experiments to assess perseverance despite satiety. For the analysis we used first an unsupervised clustering approach using drinking speed and frequency of alcohol responses and then we analyzed our data by taking sex as the differentiating factor. Unbiased clustering analysis revealed four distinct groups: Fast Bingers, Bingers, Extreme Bingers and Low drinkers. Higher alcohol consumption and faster consumption speed correlated with elevated withdrawal scores. Sex-related differences were observed, with females outnumbering males in Extreme bingers. Females also exhibited higher alcohol-seeking behavior, relapse rates, and withdrawal scores. In addition, females exhibit lower sensitivity to devaluation in the satiety test. Our results suggest that females display greater vulnerability to cue-mediated alcohol-seeking behaviors and a more inflexible behavior. This underscores the importance of considering sex as a biological variable in both preclinical and clinical research on binge drinking behaviors that is not only a hazardous behavior but may also be a critical factor in AUD vulnerability, particularly in females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.