Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42057074›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2026

Respiratory microbiota dynamics in piglets under nanotechnology-based and conventional vaccination protocols against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae.

Luís Guilherme de Oliveira, Marina Lopes Mechler-Dreibi, Gabriel Yuri Storino, Fernando Antonio Moreira Petri, Márcia Carvalho Abreu Fantini, Tereza Silva Martins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luís Guilherme de OliveiraSão Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Campus Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil. luis.guilherme@unesp.br.
Marina Lopes Mechler-DreibiSão Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Campus Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil.
Gabriel Yuri StorinoSão Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Campus Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil.
Fernando Antonio Moreira PetriSão Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Campus Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil.
Márcia Carvalho Abreu FantiniPhysics Institute, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil.
Tereza Silva MartinsDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Diadema, SP, 09913-030, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae is a key pathogen in porcine enzootic pneumonia (PEP) and plays an important role in the porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC). Understanding how vaccination strategies relate to the respiratory microbiota in piglets may provide insights into host-microbiota interactions and vaccine performance. This study evaluated the temporal dynamics of the respiratory microbiota in piglets subjected to different vaccination protocols, including a nanotechnology-based oral vaccine formulated with mesoporous silica (SBA-15), alone or combined with a commercial vaccine, on the respiratory microbiota of piglets. Forty-eight piglets from M. hyopneumoniae-free sows were divided into four experimental groups receiving different vaccination protocols: CV + SBA received the pure silica-based adjuvant (SBA-15) orally and a commercial vaccine at 24 days of life; OV3 + CV received an oral vaccine (OV) at 3 days and an intramuscular commercial vaccine at 24 days; CV received only the intramuscular commercial vaccine at 24 days; and OV + CV received both the oral and commercial vaccines at 24 days. Microbiota composition was assessed at 3, 41, and 71 days of life using 16S rRNA gene sequencing from nasal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Significant differences in nasal microbiota diversity were observed at early life stages. At D3, CV exhibited the highest diversity, while OV3 + CV had the lowest (Shannon index, p < 0.05 between CV and OV3 + CV). At D41, microbiota differences between groups had diminished, with only OV + CV showing higher richness compared with OV3 + CV (Chao1 index, p < 0.05). At D71, no significant differences were observed in overall diversity or bacterial composition among groups. As no treatment had been administered prior to sampling, these differences likely reflect baseline variability between groups. Additionally, no consistent associations were detected between microbiota diversity patterns and vaccination outcomes assessed by lung lesion scores and bacterial DNA load. These findings indicate that early-life differences in nasal microbiota were observed, but these were not sustained over time, and the respiratory microbiota converged toward a more stable community structure regardless of vaccination protocol.

Indexed as

Bacterial VaccinesMicrobiotaMycoplasma hyopneumoniaePneumonia of Swine, MycoplasmalVaccinationAdministration, OralAnimalsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidFemaleNanotechnologyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineBacterial VaccinesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacterial diversityMetagenomicsNanotechnologyNasal microbiotaOral immunization

Identifiers

PMID42057074
PMCPMC13277171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.