ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Development and evaluation of an educational video for advance care planning among Chinese university students.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a culturally appropriate an educational video for advance care planning (ACP) in China based on the Delphi-constructed training content for college students with regards to ACP and to investigate the efficacy of its application among college students.
designA two-round Delphi consultation survey was carried out to collect feedback from experts with regards to the construction of a training content indicator system for ACP and college students. In addition, we performed a quasi-experimental study to investigate the effect of these videos on college students.
methodsTraining content was preliminarily determined by performing a literature review and assessing the needs of college students via a questionnaire survey. The Delphi technique was adopted to administer two questionnaires to 18 experts. Between June 2024 and July 2024, a total of 80 college students were recruited from two universities in Chongqing Municipality; these were grouped in the order of enrollment, with 40 students in each group. One group was trained online using the newly developed ACP educational video. The other group was trained offline through regular lectures. Before and after training, we used a questionnaire to compare the two student groups in terms of their readiness for ACP and knowledge score training efficacy.
resultsThe recovery rate of information from the two rounds was 100% and 94% respectively; the expert authority coefficients were 0.87 and 0.88 respectively, and the Kendall harmony coefficient was 0.201 and 0.220 respectively. The training content relating to ACP included four first-level indicators, nine second-level indicators and 27 third-level indices. The ACP education video featured six major themes and was developed based on the Delphi. Before training, the total ACP readiness scores for the video group and the control group were 86.15 ± 7.41 and 86.23 ± 10.70, respectively. After training, the total ACP readiness scores for the video group and the control group were 96.69 ± 10.34 and 91.82 ± 8.61, respectively. The total ACP readiness score for the video group was significantly higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). The difference in the percentage of correctness for each entry of ACP knowledge between the two groups before and after training was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The scores for each entry in the video group were significantly higher than those of the control group after training (p < 0.05) for four entries: the content of ACP, the nature of living wills, the timing of activation of living wills, and the choice of decision-making agent.
conclusionThe ACP educational videos developed in this study are culturally appropriate to China, comprehensive and scientifically based, and may provide key reference guidelines for the training of college students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.