ArticleBMC medical genomics2026
Comprehensively identifying and validating the implications of NR5A1 and DHX37 variants for 46,XY disorders of sex development diagnosis.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical phenotype and pathogenic mechanism of 46,XY disorders of sex development (DSD) are complex, and several pathogenic variants are identified by next-generation sequencing. However, these variants currently require additional interpretation and validation prior to their application in 46,XY DSD diagnosis and clinical guidance.
resultsHere, we identified three genetic variants in two 46,XY DSD patients by whole exome sequencing screening and Sanger sequencing validation. The pathogenicity of three genetic variants was identified by in silico analysis and functional experiments. One patient carrying the reported pathogenic variant (c.319 C > T) of NR5A1 showed a phenotype of 46,XY complete gonadal dysgenesis, which was different from the reported 46,XY partial gonadal dysgenesis. These findings suggested that the variant (c.319 C > T) of NR5A1 contributes to the clinical phenotypic heterogeneity of 46,XY DSD. The other patient carried two genetic variants, among which the c.1252 C > T variant of NR5A1 produced truncated protein and lost the transcriptional activation of NR5A1 to the targeted genes. The other c.769G > A variant of DHX37 had no significant effect on the expression level and cellular localization of DHX37, and the downstream signaling pathway of DHX37. Moreover, the in silico and structural analysis identified the c.769G > A variant of DHX37 as a deleterious variant that may affect DHX37 function. According to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines and relevant literature reports, combined with the patient's clinical phenotype and pedigreed analysis, it is proposed that the likely pathogenic variant identified in this patient is the c.1252 C > T variant of NR5A1. Nonetheless, the potential pathogenicity of the DHX37 (c.769G > A) variant of this patient also merits further investigation and consideration.
conclusionsOur results have expanded the clinical phenotype spectrum and genetic diagnosis spectrum of 46,XY DSD, which will contribute to the accurate diagnosis and treatment guidance for 46,XY DSD patients and provide evidence-based genetic counseling for 46,XY DSD family fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.