ArticleBMC medicine2026
Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Diet, plasma proteomics, and risk of venous thromboembolism: a large-scale prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe EAT Lancet diet is increasingly recognized for its simultaneous benefits to human and planetary health. Its key components are known to exert anti-inflammatory and antiplatelet effects; however, the potential association between adherence to the EAT‑Lancet diet and incident venous thromboembolism (VTE), as well as the underlying biological mechanisms, remains unclear.
methodsThis prospective study involved 201,695 UK Biobank participants who were free of VTE at baseline, and integrated large-scale Olink plasma proteomics to identify diet-related molecular signatures. Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was quantified using two validated indices. Cox models were employed to evaluate associations between EAT-Lancet diet, plasma proteins, and incident VTE (including deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and pulmonary embolism [PE]). Mediation analyses quantified the role of plasma proteins.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 13.77 years, participants in the highest adherence group of the Stubbendorff index showed lower risks of VTE (HR = 0.809, 95% CI: 0.750-0.874), DVT (HR = 0.856, 95% CI: 0.781-0.938), and PE (HR = 0.754, 95% CI: 0.678-0.838). Consistent protective associations were observed with the Knuppel index. Mediation analyses identified 94 shared plasma protein mediators, with mediation proportions ranging from - 4.77% to 8.45% of the association, among which FABP4, LEP, and ENPP6 were the top-ranked mediators. The overall proteomic signature mediated 59.19% (95% CI: 27.02%-92.15%) and 40.10% (95% CI: 14.53%-65.96%) of the associations between the Stubbendorff and Knuppel index and incident VTE, respectively.
conclusionsHigher adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet is significantly associated with a reduced risk of incident VTE, DVT, and PE, with plasma proteins potentially mediating this effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.