Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Accessory renal arteries in prenatal hydronephrosis as a pathophysiologic contributor or incidental vascular finding: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccessory renal arteries (ARAs) are recognized as an extrinsic cause of hydronephrosis in children; however, their relationship with prenatally detected hydronephrosis remains unclear. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and Doppler characteristics of ARAs in fetuses with antenatal hydronephrosis and to compare renal morphologic and vascular parameters with those of a control group.
methodsThis prospective observational study included 123 singleton pregnancies between 18 and 36 weeks' gestation. Fetuses were classified into a hydronephrosis group (n = 67) and a control group with normal renal anatomy (n = 56). Renal morphologic measurements and standardized renal vascular Doppler examinations were performed in all cases. The presence of ARAs was assessed using color and spectral Doppler imaging.
resultsARAs were more frequently detected in the hydronephrosis group than in controls (10.4% vs. 3.6%), although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.180). No significant differences were found in renal pelvic anteroposterior diameters (right: p = 0.42; left: p = 0.39), renal volumes (right: p = 0.67; left: p = 0.71), or main renal artery pulsatility indices (right: p = 0.332; left: p = 0.258), between fetuses with and without ARAs in either the hydronephrosis or control groups.
conclusionsARAs were more frequently observed in fetuses with hydronephrosis than in controls; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in renal morphology or main renal artery hemodynamic parameters according to ARA status during fetal life. These findings suggest that ARAs may represent a variant of renal vascular anatomy rather than a pathological burden in the prenatal setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.