ArticleBMC cancer2026
Clinical characteristics and prognosis of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia patients with RUNX1::RUNX1T1.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) patients with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed. Twenty-three t-AML patients with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 were included as the case group. Ninety-two de novo AML patients with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 were randomly selected using the case-pair method in a 1:4 ratio who matched for (1) sex, (2) age (± 5 years), (3) time of diagnosis (± 3 years). A total of 115 AML patients with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 were enrolled.
resultsThe CR rate after two cycles in t-AML patients with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 was same to that in de novo AML patients with RUNX1::RUNX1T1(95.6% vs. 95.6%, p = 0.48). Survival analysis indicated the 3-year overall survival (OS) of t-AML and de novo AML patients with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 were 68.2% vs. 83.1% (P = 0.23), and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) were 60.9% vs. 65.3% (P = 0.84). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age ≥ 60 years, CCND3, DNMT3A and FLT3 mutation were independent adverse factors, but achieving MMR after three cycles were independent favorable factors for survival of AML patients with RUNX1::RUNX1T1.
conclusionsThis study showed no significant differences in remission rates and survival between the two groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age ≥ 60 years, CCND3, DNMT3A and FLT3 mutation were independent adverse factors, but achieving MMR after three cycles were independent favorable factors for survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.