ArticlePoultry science2026
A comprehensive study on enrofloxacin residue depletion in five chicken breeds.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread use of enrofloxacin (ENR) in poultry farming raises public-health concerns due to residue persistence, particularly in indigenous chickens where standard withdrawal times (WTs) may be inadequate. This study characterized depletion kinetics of ENR and its metabolite ciprofloxacin (CIP) across five commercially relevant breeds in China. We developed and validated a sensitive LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of ENR and CIP in four edible tissues. After oral administration at 10 mg/kg body weight (bw) once daily for 5 days, tissues from AA broilers, WOD168, Jinling Partridge, Xueshan, and Jinling black-bone chickens were sampled at six time points through day 14. Results showed pronounced breed-dependent differences in elimination. White-feathered lines (AA and WOD168) cleared residues rapidly, with concentrations at or below maximum residue limits (MRLs) within 3 days. In contrast, yellow-feathered breeds showed markedly prolonged persistence, especially in skin with fat. Jinling black-bone chickens exhibited the most extreme retention, with residues detectable in all tissues at day 14 and skin with fat reaching 898.96 μg/kg, a value nearly nine-fold the MRL. WTs were estimated with WT 1.4 using the EMA 95/95 approach under Chinese MRLs, with residues expressed as ENR plus CIP. Overall WTs were 2.30 to 2.64 days for white-feathered lines and 8.16 to 39.74 days for yellow-feathered breeds, with skin with fat consistently the limiting tissue. These findings provide a scientific basis for breed-specific withdrawal guidance and identify skin with fat as a critical monitoring target to ensure poultry food safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.