Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056820›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Applicability and performance evaluation of the Shennong 1 chicken 40 K liquid chip in commercial chicken populations.

Zhao Cai, Shu Wang, Chaoqun Gao, Chenpeng Xiao, Yulong Ma, Yunjuan Liu, Kejun Wang, Yadong Tian, Xuewei Fan, Hangran Gao and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zhao CaiThe Shennong Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Shu WangThe Shennong Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Chaoqun GaoThe Shennong Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Chenpeng XiaoThe Shennong Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Yulong MaThe Shennong Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Yunjuan LiuThe Shennong Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Kejun WangThe Shennong Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Yadong TianThe Shennong Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Xuewei FanHenan Fengyuan Poultry Industry Company Limited, Nanyang 473003, China.
Hangran GaoHenan Fengyuan Poultry Industry Company Limited, Nanyang 473003, China.
Guirong SunThe Shennong Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China; Henan Fengyuan Poultry Industry Company Limited, Nanyang 473003, China.
Xiangtao KangThe Shennong Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Wenting LiThe Shennong Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450046, China. Electronic address: liwenting_5959@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the applicability and analytical performance of the Shennong 1 Chicken 40 K Liquid chip (Shennong chip) in commercial chicken populations, parental lines of Australorp (Arp) and Rhode Island Red (RIR) chickens were analyzed using both whole-genome resequencing (WGS) and Shennong chip genotyping. A total of 128 individuals were included. The performance of Shennong chip was evaluated by comparing its results with those of WGS through population genetics analyses, including assessment of population structure, genetic diversity and selection signatures. Across analyses, Shennong chip showed high concordance with WGS in population genetic inference. For example, the first two principal components derived from the two datasets showed nearly identical distributions, with Pearson correlation coefficients close to 0.99. Similar cluster pattern was observed between WGS and Shenong chip results in ancestry inference at K = 2 and K = 3. Genetic diversity estimates suggested moderate levels of variation (Shennong chip: He ≈ 0.34-0.40; WGS: pi ≈ 0.0027-0.0037) across all four parental lines, with relatively higher diversity(He ≈ 0.40; pi ≈ 0.0037) observed in the Rhode Island Red D line. The SNP chip reliably captured major population structure patterns, genetic diversity differences among parental lines, and biologically interpretable selection signals. Functional enrichment analyses based on SNP chip-derived candidate regions further revealed distinct selection orientations between parental lines. LSBL analysis identified Arp-specific selection signals, while joint F_

Indexed as

ChickensGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAnimalsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideWhole Genome SequencingCommercial chickensPerformance evaluationShennong 1 chicken 40 K liquid chipWhole-genome resequencing

Identifiers

PMID42056820
PMCPMC13141720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.