ReviewInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2026
Contemporary risk assessment and risk-reducing strategies for tubo-ovarian cancer in women with BRCA pathogenic variants.
Review in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tubo-ovarian cancer represents the most lethal gynecologic malignancy, and its burden is compounded by the absence of effective screening and the substantial lifetime risk carried by women with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants. While risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy remains the standard for prevention, conferring reduction in tubo-ovarian cancer risk and improved overall survival, it also induces premature menopause with significant effects on quality of life and bone, cardiovascular, and sexual health. These consequences have driven the exploration of alternative preventive strategies, and a paradigm shift toward individualized risk assessment. Emerging data highlight that tubo-ovarian cancer risk among BRCA pathogenic variant carriers is not uniform but influenced by gene type, variant position, family history, and modifiable factors such as parity, breastfeeding, and oral contraceptive use. Modern risk models integrate genetic, familial, and lifestyle data to refine personalized estimates and guide the timing of intervention. Concurrently, the understanding that many high-grade serous carcinomas originate in the fallopian tube has prompted evaluation of risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy as a staged surgical strategy that may balance oncologic safety with preservation of hormonal function. Ultimately, management of BRCA pathogenic variant carriers must combine genomic precision, reproductive planning, and patient-centered counseling to align cancer prevention with quality of life, supporting truly individualized care in hereditary tubo-ovarian cancer risk reduction. Despite several reviews on hereditary tubo-ovarian cancer prevention, a clinically relevant gap remains in translating contemporary evidence into a practical counseling framework for women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence on tubo-ovarian cancer risk assessment and risk-reducing strategies in this population, with a focus on individualized counseling and shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.