Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056783›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2026

Contemporary risk assessment and risk-reducing strategies for tubo-ovarian cancer in women with BRCA pathogenic variants.

David Viveros-Carreño, Isabel Beshar, Nuria Agustí, Ananya Murthy, Nathalia Mora-Soto, Maria D Iniesta, Karla Barajas, Alexander Melamed, J Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Roni Nitecki Wilke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David Viveros-CarreñoClínica Universitaria Colombia, Clínica Colsanitas S.A., Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Grupo de Investigación Salud de la Mujer Sanitas, Bogotá, Colombia; Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo (CTIC), Grupo de Investigación GIGA, Unidad Ginecología Oncológica, Bogotá, Colombia. Electronic address: dviverosc@gmail.com.
Isabel BesharThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Nuria AgustíThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Ananya MurthyThe University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.
Nathalia Mora-SotoCentro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo (CTIC), Grupo de Investigación GIGA, Unidad Ginecología Oncológica, Bogotá, Colombia; Clínica del Country, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Bogotá, Colombia.
Maria D IniestaThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Karla BarajasThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Alexander MelamedMassachusetts General Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Boston, MA, USA.
J Alejandro Rauh-HainThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Roni Nitecki WilkeThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Training of Academic Gynecologic OncologistsT32CA101642 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ANIL K SOOD, Kathleen Schmeler · 2005 to 2026
$9.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA101642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tubo-ovarian cancer represents the most lethal gynecologic malignancy, and its burden is compounded by the absence of effective screening and the substantial lifetime risk carried by women with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants. While risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy remains the standard for prevention, conferring reduction in tubo-ovarian cancer risk and improved overall survival, it also induces premature menopause with significant effects on quality of life and bone, cardiovascular, and sexual health. These consequences have driven the exploration of alternative preventive strategies, and a paradigm shift toward individualized risk assessment. Emerging data highlight that tubo-ovarian cancer risk among BRCA pathogenic variant carriers is not uniform but influenced by gene type, variant position, family history, and modifiable factors such as parity, breastfeeding, and oral contraceptive use. Modern risk models integrate genetic, familial, and lifestyle data to refine personalized estimates and guide the timing of intervention. Concurrently, the understanding that many high-grade serous carcinomas originate in the fallopian tube has prompted evaluation of risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy as a staged surgical strategy that may balance oncologic safety with preservation of hormonal function. Ultimately, management of BRCA pathogenic variant carriers must combine genomic precision, reproductive planning, and patient-centered counseling to align cancer prevention with quality of life, supporting truly individualized care in hereditary tubo-ovarian cancer risk reduction. Despite several reviews on hereditary tubo-ovarian cancer prevention, a clinically relevant gap remains in translating contemporary evidence into a practical counseling framework for women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence on tubo-ovarian cancer risk assessment and risk-reducing strategies in this population, with a focus on individualized counseling and shared decision-making.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFallopian Tube NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationHumansRisk AssessmentRisk Reduction BehaviorSalpingo-oophorectomyBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA1 Protein/GeneticsBRCA2 Protein/GeneticsOvarian NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentSalpingo-Oophorectomy

Identifiers

PMID42056783
PMCPMC13371952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.