Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056728›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of cancer2026

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Early Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel Versus an Anthracycline-Free Regimen With Docetaxel, Cyclophosphamide-Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Manuel Hörner, Henning Schäffler, Lothar Häberle, Chloë Goossens, Kerstin Pfister, Elena Leinert, Kristina Veselinovic, Sara Y Brucker, Uwe Köhler, Georg Heinrich and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00847444 (Simultaneous Study of Docetaxel Based Anthracycline Free Adjuvant Treatment Evaluation, as Well as Life Style Intervention Strategies), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00847444 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Simultaneous Study of Docetaxel Based Anthracycline Free Adjuvant Treatment Evaluation, as Well as Life Style Intervention Strategies

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilip HeppRan2009 to 2016Enrolled3,547ConditionsBreast CancerArmsDrug-based intervention, Lifestyle-based Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Manuel HörnerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6934-992X
Henning SchäfflerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Lothar HäberleDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4019-9328
Chloë GoossensDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2809-8082
Kerstin PfisterDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Elena LeinertDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Kristina VeselinovicDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Sara Y BruckerDepartment of Women's Health, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Uwe KöhlerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany.
Georg HeinrichSchwerpunktpraxis der Gynäkologie und Onkologie Fürstenwalde, Klinikum Offenbach, Fürstenwalde, Germany.
Andreas SchneeweissNational Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias W BeckmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Peter A FaschingDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4885-8471
Wolfgang JanniDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Brigitte RackDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Sabine HeubleinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Philipp ZieglerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

Chugai PharmaceuticalGlaxoSmithKlinePfizerSanofi-Aventis Deutschland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains an important side effect despite new antiemetic drugs. This study tried to understand the occurrence of CINV in patients receiving two different chemotherapy regimens. As part of the randomized controlled clinical trial SUCCESS C (NCT00847444), 1582 of the 3463 patients completed CINV diaries. Patients were randomized to receive either chemotherapy with FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) or TC (docetaxel, cyclophosphamide). CINV was evaluated hourly using a specially designed questionnaire. Endpoints of the study were complete response (no emesis) and total control (no nausea and no emesis) and were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses over three chemotherapy cycles. Eight hundred fourteen patients received FEC and 768 received TC; patients and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. Patients receiving FEC had significantly more nausea and vomiting, with the main difference in the first 12 h. In the first cycle, the 0-12-h nausea/emesis-free rates were 70%/41% for FEC and 91/76% for TC. By 24 h after chemotherapy, the rates were 65%/33% (FEC) and 85%/60% (TC). The differences were similar in cycles 2 and 3. The detailed analysis of CINV in the study is unique and paves the way for modern CINV analysis of new therapeutics such as antibody-drug conjugates.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsNauseaVomitingAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantCyclophosphamideDocetaxelEpirubicinFemaleFluorouracilHumansMiddle AgedTaxoidsCyclophosphamideDocetaxelEpirubicinFluorouracilTaxoidschemotherapychemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)early breast cancerrandomized clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID42056728
PMCPMC13495824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.