Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056705›Full record

ReviewAmbio2026

From wilderness to cohabitation: Literature review on human presence in environmental ethics.

Teea Kortetmäki, Gonzalo Cortés Capano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Teea KortetmäkiDepartment of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä, PO BOX 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland. teea.kortetmaki@jyu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1682-8462
Gonzalo Cortés CapanoSocial-Ecological Interactions in Agricultural Systems, University of Kassel and University of Göttingen, Kassel and Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6714-6560

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 101116727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land use and biodiversity conservation are increasingly recognized as ethical and value-laden topics rather than merely ecological or socio-technical problems. While this has increased multidisciplinary and participatory approaches in research, explicit engagement with environmental ethics, where those questions are scrutinized though an ethical lens, remains limited. To address this need, we reviewed how the environmental ethics literature defines and characterizes active human presence across different environments, how it frames human impacts on nonhumans, and the assumptions and normative implications articulated by these perspectives. Using a narrative approach, we identify four main narratives from environmental ethics on human and nonhuman coexistence: wilderness, rural stewardship, urban cohabitation, and relational narratives. By synthesizing these narratives, our findings offer conceptual tools that can support sustainability researchers, practitioners, and policymakers reflect more critically on the ethical dimensions of land-use decisions and better navigate contested visions of desirable landscape futures.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesWildernessBiodiversityHumansCoexistenceGenealogical analysisHuman-nature relationsLand stewardshipRelational ethicsValues

Identifiers

PMID42056705
PMCPMC13554035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.