ArticleMolecular and cellular pediatrics2026
Phenocopies of 22q11.2DS: revealing genetic diversity in clinically suspected 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.
Article in Molecular and cellular pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is one of the most common microdeletion syndromes, a substantial proportion of patients with clinically suspected 22q11.2DS (clin22q11.2) remain without a definitive diagnosis. While CNVs other than the typical 22q11.2 deletion have been identified in patients with clin22q11.2 (defined here as phenocopies of 22q11.2DS, or phen22q11.2), SNVs associated with phen22q11.2 are less well defined.
resultsWe aimed to investigate genetic variants associated with phen22q11.2 to achieve definitive diagnoses and improve clinical management in the clin22q11.2 cohort, while also comparing the phenotypic features of 22q11.2DS and phen22q11.2 to guide optimal diagnostic approaches. We assessed 336 consecutive pediatric patients from three centers presenting with clin22q11.2 according to Tobias criteria. Diagnostic testing included fluorescence in situ hybridization or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in all patients. In subsets of patients, additional investigations were performed as clinically indicated, including but not limited to karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis, and/or exome sequencing (ES) with CNV detection. To identify phenotypic differences, Fisher's exact test and Chi-squared test were performed. Genetic abnormalities were identified in 127 patients, including 88 patients diagnosed with 22q11.2DS. Phen22q11.2 was identified in 39 patients, including de novo variants in 12 patients. Several SNVs were detected, including variants in recurrently affected genes, such as CHD7 (n = 4), TBX1 (n = 2), JAG1 (n = 2), as well as variants in genes implicated in rare and ultra-rare diseases. We also described several rare and previously unreported clinical features associated with variants linked to phen22q11.2. No statistically significant phenotypic differences were observed between patients with phen22q11.2 and those with 22q11.2DS.
conclusionsPhen22q11.2 is genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous. The results support the use of ES with CNV analysis as a first-tier, high-throughput diagnostic approach in clin22q11.2, as comprehensive genomic testing is essential for improving diagnostic accuracy and optimizing both genetic counseling and clinical management in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.