ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Centroid analysis: Inferring concept representations from open-ended word responses.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present research proposes and evaluates a novel method - centroid analysis - for measuring representations and concepts at both individual and group levels by mapping open-ended responses onto a pre-existing semantic vector space. Centroid analysis allows us to retrace the target concept as the geometric center of the semantic vectors of the responses generated by this concept. At the group level, centroid analysis enables researchers to compare conceptual structures across different populations to investigate how factors such as language, culture, cognitive differences, educational background, or exposure to specific narratives shape shared representations. At the individual level, centroid analysis enables fine-grained assessments of how personal experiences, expertise, cognitive styles, and even temporary contextual influences affect conceptual representations. We evaluate this method using two distributional semantic models across several calculation methods, reference lexicon sizes, response types, and datasets with tasks ranging from single-word substitutions to single and multiple free associations and multiple feature generation. We conclude that at the group level, the best method to retrace the response-generating concept as a vector in a multi-dimensional semantic space from the averaged vectors of participant responses is to collect multiple free associations (70 unique and 245 total responses per target), use fastText for meaning-to-vector mapping for responses and targets, and to consider each response in the centroid calculation as often as it occurred in the data. At the individual level, the best results are achieved by employing fastText and considering at least eight responses per item per participant in the centroid calculation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.