ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale after cryptogenic stroke - a comparison between patients < 60 versus ≥ 60 years-of-age.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cryptogenic ischemic stroke is strongly associated with patent foramen ovale (PFO). Current guidelines recommend percutaneous PFO closure in patients < 60 years-of-age. This study aimed to compare the incidences of recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), and atrial fibrillation after percutaneous PFO closure in patients aged ≥ 60 years with patients < 60 years-of-age. This retrospective study included all adult Swedish patients with cryptogenic stroke treated with percutaneous closure of PFO 2001–2023. Patient characteristics and procedural details were obtained from the Swedish registry of adult congenital heart disease. Preprocedural atrial fibrillation and post-procedural incidence of recurrent cerebral infarction, TIA, and atrial fibrillation were obtained from the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare’s registry of patient diagnoses. To compare differences across age groups, logistic-, quantile-, and linear regression models were used. P-values < 0.050 were considered significant. In total, 1,101 patients were included with follow-up time 7.1 ± 5.8 years, of which 12% (n = 134) were ≥ 60 years-of-age. Low prevalence of preprocedural comorbidity was seen in both age groups and there was no difference in incidence of atrial fibrillation within 3 months after PFO closure (≥ 60 years-of-age n = 4, 3.0%, < 60 years-of-age n = 23, 2.4%, p = 0.229), or recurrent cerebral infarction/TIA (≥ 60 years-of-age n = 3, 2.7%, < 60 years-of-age n = 17, 1.5%, p = 0.697) between the age groups. Based on the results from this nation-wide study, percutaneous PFO closure can be considered a safe and efficient therapy in the reduction of recurrent stroke in patients older than 60 years with low preprocedural comorbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.